Monday, April 20, 2009

Barry Rubin: No Israel US - confrontation

This is so right and obvious, and yet nobody has written about it. There is not going to be any big confrontation, because it would be stupid for either side to have one. Even if there are differences of opinion, they will be minimized. There were in fact, material differences of opinion with the Bush administration, over settlements, treatment of Hamas and of course, Iran. But nobody made a big deal out of them. Admiral Mullen said then, precisely what he has said now, and the Bush administration, like the Obama administration, had not given Israel a green light to attack Iran.   

Sunday, April 19, 2009

THE CONFRONTATION CON-GAME

THE CONFRONTATION CON-GAME
By Barry Rubin


There are many people eager to see President Barack Obama and his administration bash Israel, or predict that's already happened. But the administration has yet to make significant direct anti-Israel actions or statements.

Despite rumors and speculation at this point there's still no solid evidence. While, obviously, things could change at any time I expect this widely predicted conflict isn't going to take place.

Let me emphasize the word "direct" from the first paragraph. Inasmuch as the U.S. government gives up too much to Iran, Syria, and radical Islamists, it hurts Israel's interests, as well as those of most Arab governments and the United States itself.

Still, what's happened so far is being taken out of context by those who want a U.S.-Israel confrontation because they hate either Israel or Obama.

Contrast this alleged confrontation with the real but largely ignored conflict in U.S.-Europe relations. Obama's trip to Europe was a failure. To everything he asked—a parallel strategy for dealing with economic troubles, getting Turkey into the European Union, or more help in Afghanistan—the Europeans said "no." Then everyone proclaimed the visit a great success.

With Israel, it's the opposite. No confrontation happens but it's presented that way. Let's look at some examples:

--Endorsing a two-state solution isn't an attack on Israel's government. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu doesn't oppose a two-state solution—and hasn't for 12 years--but emphasizes this would only happen if and when a Palestinian leadership proves its credibility and makes a decent offer. If the Obama administration says it's going to succeed, so did its last three predecessors.

This issue raises the most important single guideline for Israeli policy, which shouldn't merely consist of saying, "We want peace and a two-state solution" ten times a day. It should raise its own demands that the Palestinian Authority keeps its commitments and that any negotiated solution include Palestinian as well as Israeli concessions.

Giving the Palestinians a state is conditional on that happening, not a blank check given whatever they do. There's nothing wrong with Israel demanding reciprocity. A strategy of offering everything and demanding nothing neither made Israel popular nor brought about a negotiated solution.

--U.S. engagement with Iran: While this is risky and likely give Iran's regime time to develop nuclear weapons, administration statements say engagement's purpose is to stop that. I'm not sure a Bush administration would be doing much more. The key point will be whether the Obama administration ever concludes Iran's regime doesn't intend to change its behavior.

More - THE CONFRONTATION CON-GAME

Most Durban delegates applaud Ahmadinejad's Holocaust denial speech; Jordan, European countries walk out

Frustrating that the article doesn't tell us what countries walked out, but Ynet reported that Jordan was one of them. Good for you, dear neighbors!  At least some countries did not applaud Holocaust denial.
 
Honor roll: Countries (in addition to Israel) thatboycotted the Durban II conference on furthering racism: Australia, Canada,  Holland, Italy, Germany, New Zealand, Poland,  United States,
 
UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon remained seated through the Holocaust  denial remarks. Numerous delegates applauded.
 
Delegates walk out on Ahmadinejad at Geneva
Apr. 20, 2009
JPost.com Staff and AP , THE JERUSALEM POST
 
Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for the eradication of Israel as he addressed the United Nations anti-racism conference which
opened its week long event in Geneva on Monday.
 
"Governments must be encouraged and supported in their fights at eradicating this barbaric racism. Efforts must be made to put an end to Zionism," he said in the rambling speech he gave at the podium.
 
As he spoke, some 23 EU delegates were seen walking out the room when Ahmadinejad said Israel was created on the "pretext of Jewish suffering" from World War II.
 
Ahmadinejad began his speech by pointing the finger at the United States, Europe and Israel and said they were destabilizing the entire world. "Those in authority at the time set off two world wars," Ahmadinejad said, in an accusation directed at Western powers. He went on to accuse those powers of "killing hundred of millions of people and causing mass destruction" also in Africa and Asia.
 
"Those who won [the Second World War], considered that the world was with them," he said, and "set up laws that were oppressive and trampling."
 
Ahmadinejad then went on to criticize the UN: "The Security Council set up after World War II, let's analyze it. The veto vote - is that equality? Is that justice? Is that equality amongst human beings?" he asked, "Or rather is it arrogance and humiliation? The Security Council must be the most important body for decision-making in order to promote peace. If a law is based on force, how can we secure peace and justice? The seeking of power and arrogance means racism, injustice and occupation."
 
At this point the Iranian president's speech moved to the subject of Israel and the Palestinians.
 
"As was the case after World War II, armies occupied other territories and people were transferred from territories. In reality, under the pretext of compensating for the evil done in the name of xenophobia, they in fact set up the most violent xenophobes, in Palestine."
 
"The Security Council made it possible for that illegitimate government to be set up. For 60 years, this government was supported by the world. Many Western countries say they are fighting racism; but in fact support it with occupation, bombings and crimes such as those committed in Gaza. These countries support the criminals," Ahmadinejad said.
 
Just as Ahmadinejad took the podium at the opening of the international anti-racism conference in Geneva on Monday, two men in multi-colored clown wigs stood up from both sides of the conference hall and tried to reach the podium. One of the men threw a soft red object at Ahmadinejad.
 
He was immediately escorted out of the hall by security personnel. In his opening remarks, Ahmadinejad called the man "ignorant."
 
Calls from the balcony were heard throughout the speech.
 
Still, the majority of the delegates greeted the Iranian president with a round of applause.
 
Ahmadinejad also blamed Israel for America's invasion of Iraq, which he said benefited Israeli arms sales.
 
He spoke to the UN assembly on the eve of Holocaust Memorial Day, which commemorates the slaughter of six million Jews by the Nazis
during World War II.

Unholy alliance of the left and reactionary terrorists

From Ray Cook: Double Dutch - the unholy alliance of Left and Right against Israel and the Jews:

One of the most disturbing aspects of the global war of deligitimisation of Israel is the alliance of the European extreme left with terrorism.

So, for example, Respect's George Galloway is quite jubilant about supporting Hamas and denies that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wants to wipe Israel off the map. Meanwhile Gerry Adams, former IRA supremo turned politician, also sees fit to cosy up to Hamas.

Of course, the common interest of the extreme Left, Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran is their loathing of Zionism. The fact that this includes loathing of Jews generally is glossed over by the Left, is denied or represented as paranoia or an attempt to scotch criticism of Israel. It is why the Dutch Labour Party supports demonstrations at which bigots call out "Hamas Hamas, Joden aan het Gas" (Hamas, Hamas, Jews to the gas). Here's a YouTube video where Harry van Bommel, a Dutch MP, is leading a chant of "Intifida" to an unchallenged background chant of "Hamas Hamas, Joden aan het Gas"

More at Double Dutch - the unholy alliance of Left and Right against Israel and the Jews:

Confrontation at Durban II: Tables Turned on Libyan Chair When Torture Victim Blasts Qaddafi Hypocrisy








Confrontation at Durban II: Tables Turned on Libyan Chair When Torture Victim Blasts Qaddafi Hypocrisy

Must-See Video: Head of U.N.'s "Anti-Racism" Conference
Caught Like a Deer in Headlights


Today Iranian President Ahmadinejad — the world's leading Holocaust denier — will be in Geneva to address the U.N.'s "anti-racism" conference, known as Durban II. The U.N. gathering claims to be about fighting racism and discrimination, but in fact it's organized by the world's worst perpetrators of racism, discrimination and human rights abuses, and was designed to scapegoat Israel, America and the West. A representative of Libyan dictator Col. Muammar Qaddafi, Mrs. Najjat al-Hajjaji, chaired the Durban II Preparatory Committee for the past two years, and today was elected chair of the Durban II Main Committee.

 



In an unprecedented coup, the rank hypocrisy of Durban II was exposed before the world this week when UN Watch surprised the Libyan chair — by bringing a victim of Qaddafi torture to confront her on Libya's brutal torture and scapegoating of five Bulgairan nurses and a Palestinian doctor. The video clip has been broadcast around the globe.

 CLICK HERE TO WATCH DRAMATIC VIDEO


To support the unique and vital work of UN Watch
with a U.S. tax-deductible donation, please contribute here.


tel: (41-22) 734-1472 fax: (41-22) 734-1613
www.unwatch.org

  

Copyright 2009 by United Nations Watch. All Rights Reserved.

 

 




As a registered user of www.JPost.com, you will receive occasional email announcements or offers from The Jerusalem Post and on behalf of our advertisers. When you registered, you may have indicated certain preferences. (See Manage My Subscription Preferences below.) If you do not wish to receive such offers or announcements, you will have to Unsubscribe from our service. To safeguard your privacy, we have not provided your e-mail address or other personal information to any advertiser. Please read our privacy policy for more details.
Please do not hit the "reply" button. If you want to contact us directly, please send an email to feedback.

***The content of this advertisement does not reflect the editorial views and opinions of The Jerusalem Post in any way. ***




Politically Correct: Palestinian Voices for Violence and Genocide

It is always better when people are honest about their intentions. Therefore, among the (relatively) moderate Arab voices, Ramzy Baroud's article deploring nonviolence (that's right - not a typo) is outstanding.

Baroud, who has been fighting the good fight to drive the Jews into the sea, pulls no punches and leaves nobody with any illusions. In an editorial published by the European funded Maan News service, Baroud expresses his dismay regarding the world support for non-violence. Let's not decry murder, says Baroud.

In recent history, many advocates of non-violence have been celebrated as modern day icons. From Ghandi to King, songs are written in their honor, their life stories fill the pages of our children's history volumes as noble examples of which everyone must aspire to emulate. Holidays are instituted in their honor and around the world; streets and boulevards carry their namesake.

Why is it that the "establishment" goes to such great lengths to lift up these individuals? Where are the holidays commemorating the life and sacrifices of Malcolm X, where are the stories of Crazy Horse or Geronimo?

Yes! Finally someone said it. Gandhi and King are terrible examples for Palestinian children, who are supposed to be learning to kill Jews. I mean, why is there a Martin Luther King Day, but there is no Genghis Kahn day? The Unibomber doesn't get his own commemoration day either. Why doesn't the world honor real heroes of murder and genocide like Osama Bin Laden or Heinrich Himmler If Baroud had his way they wouldn't honor wimps like King and Gandhi.

Today is Adolph Hitler's birthday and I bet you forgot to bake a cake. Baroud wouldn't forget a thing like that. The Palestinian Authority would never forget to honor a fellow like "the Engineer" - Palestinian terrorist Yehyeh Ayash, who got a square named for him - the Palestinian Gandhi. Let's face it, anyone who could blow up all those Jews has to be a hero, right? All is not lost however. In the Ukraine, they have lots of streets and statues honoring Bogdan Khmelnitsky. Khlmelnitsky is a Ukrainian national hero, having killed about 100,000 Jews in various pogroms. The Ukrainians even named a town after their hero. Appropriately enough, the town so named used to be the town of Proskurov where about 5,000 to 10,000 Jews were murdered in February of 1919. There is your hero, Mr. Baroud.

More: Politically Correct: Palestinian Voices for Violence and Genocide

 

Saudi Arabia Here comes the bride, all dressed in diapers

""The judge's refusal to nullify the marriage means that every young girl whose father is bankrupt or in debt can sell their girls just because he's getting the right price," AlMugaiteeb continued."
 
That's free enterprise, no? What is interesting is how little media coverage this issue gets in the West. UNICEF has protested.  
 
 
 
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
 

Outraged human rights groups are calling the decision by a Saudi court to — not once, but twice — refuse to void the marriage of an 8-year-old girl to a man several years her senior a form of human trafficking.
 
On Saturday, for the second time since December, a court in the Saudi town of Unaiza upheld the marriage of the Saudi girl to the much older man, on the condition that he does not have sex with her until she reaches puberty, Reuters reported.
 
State Department spokesman Robert Wood condemned the marriage Wednesday as a "clear and unacceptable violation of human rights."
 
"The Saudis know of our concern," Wood told reporters. "And it's not just our concern. It's a concern of others in the international community."
 
Organizations like UNICEF were troubled by the ruling, calling it an abuse of the child's rights.
 
"UNICEF is deeply concerned by reports that Saudi Arabian tribunals have decided not to annul the marriage of an 8-year-old girl," the U.N. children's agency said in a statement on its Web site. "Irrespective of circumstances or the legal framework, the marriage of a child is a violation of that child's rights."
 
"This particular girl was sold, literally," Dr. Ali Alyami, founder and director of the Center for Democracy and Human Rights in Saudi Arabia, told FOXNews.com. "This is pure human trafficking. The girl's father was in need of money and he sold her."
 
Financial problems prompt some Saudi families to marry off their underage daughters to much older men — a practice the kingdom's chief cleric Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdelaziz Al al-Sheikh endorses. Media reports claim that the 8 year-old girl's father arranged the marriage in exchange to clear his debts with the man.
 
The ruling reportedly prompted Saudi Justice Minister Mohamed al-Issa to call for regulations on such marriages with the goal of ending "arbitrariness by parents and guardians in marrying off minor girls," an announcement seen as jargon used to satisfy opponents.
 
"This is rubbish, they've been saying this for a long time," said Alyami. "It's just to silence their critics. They will pass something just to calm the situation down. There will be no drastic changes to the system."
 
Alyami said the ruling further contributes to a "very nasty" environment for women in Saudi Arabia due to "oppression and condemnation" solely based on their gender.
 
"It's a sad moment for women's rights and particularly of young girls in Saudi Arabia. It's a gross and huge violation of human rights," added Ibrahim AlMugaiteeb, president and founder of the Human Rights First Society.
 
"The judge's refusal to nullify the marriage means that every young girl whose father is bankrupt or in debt can sell their girls just because he's getting the right price," AlMugaiteeb continued.
 
Alyami, meanwhile, called on U.S. officials to intervene.
 
"First and foremost, our government should condemn this," he said. "President Obama should lead the way."
 
Click here to read more on this story from Reuters.
 
FOXNews.com's Joshua Rhett Miller and FOX News' Nina Donaghy contributed to this report.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Cat appointed to watch cream: Libyan racist rights violations exposed by Palestinian at Durban II conference

Summud! 
 
Libya's Durban II Chair Cuts Off Libyan Victim
News and Analysis from UN Watch in Geneva
Briefing No. 190  |  April 18, 2009        
 

UN Watch Turns Tables on Libyan Chair, Exposes Durban 2 Hypocrisy
Qaddafi rep panics and cuts off torture victim testimony

http://www.unwatch.org/cms.asp?id=741148&campaign_id=63111

The U.S. has decided not to attend the Durban II conference opening Monday in Geneva -- click here for more.
 
Meanwhile, the top story on Swiss TV news last night was the surpise "coup d'eclat" by UN Watch, when it turned the tables on the Libyan chair of the Durban II planning committee, in a showdown yesterday that exposed the U.N. hypocrisy whereby the chief organizers of a world "anti-racism" conference are themselves the worst perpetrators of racism and discrimination. See the full exchange below, and related legal brief. Click here for dramatic video (in French). Stay tuned for the YouTube video of the full debate.

United Nations Durban Review Conference
Preparatory Committee, Third Substantive Session
17 April 2009, Geneva

Statement by United Nations Watch
Delivered by Ashraf Ahmed El-Hojouj

Thank you, Madame Chair.

I don't know if you recognize me. I am the Palestinian medical intern who was scapegoated by your country, Libya, in the HIV case in the Benghazi hospital, together with the five Bulgarian nurses.

LIBYAN CHAIR NAJJAT AL-HAJJAJI, BANGING ON GAVEL: Stop... stop.... I ask you to stop. You are, you are not addressing the agenda item... I will allow you to resume only if you address the agenda item we are discussing.

[Victim resumes testimony]

Section 1 of the draft declaration for this conference speaks about victims of racism, discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance. Based on my own suffering, I wish to offer some proposals.

Starting in 1999, as you know, the five nurses and I were falsely arrested, prosecuted, imprisoned, brutally tortured, convicted, and sentenced to death.

LIBYAN CHAIR NAJJAT AL-HAJJAJI, AGAIN BANGING ON GAVEL: Stop... You are again not addressing the agenda item. I urge you to address the agenda item.

[Victim resumes testimony]

All of this, which lasted for nearly a decade, was for only one reason: because the Libyan government was looking to scapegoat foreigners. Madame Chair, if that is not discrimination, then what is?

On the basis of my personal experience, I would like to propose the following amendments regarding remedies, redress and compensatory measures:

One: The United Nations should condemn countries that scapegoat, falsely arrest, and torture vulnerable minorities.

Two: Countries that have committed such crimes must recognize their past, and issue an official, public, and unequivocal apology to the victims.

Three:  In accordance with Article 2, paragraph 3 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, such countries must provide victims of discrimination with an appropriate remedy, including adequate compensation for material and immaterial damage.

Madame Chair, Libya told this conference that it practices no inequality or discrimination.

But then how do you account for what was done to me, to my colleagues, and to my family, who gave over thirty years serving your country, only to be kicked out  from their home, threatened with death, and subjected to state terrorism?

LIBYAN CHAIR NAJJAT AL-HAJJAJI, AGAIN BANGING ON GAVEL: There is a request for a point of order. I give Libya the floor for a point of order.

LIBYAN DIPLOMAT:  Madame Chair, I object to the testimony by UN Watch. This is not the correct agenda item. Thank you, Madame Chair.

LIBYAN CHAIR NAJJAT AL-HAJJAJI: We shall now move on to the next speaker...

[Due to the unjustified cut-off by the Chair, the following portions were unable to be read.]

How can your government chair the planning committee for a world conference on discrimination, when it is on the list of the world's worst of the worst, when it comes to discrimination and human rights violations?

When will your government recognize their crimes, apologize to me, to my colleagues, and to our families?

This week, at the Geneva Summit for Human Rights, Tolerance and Democracy, the five nurses and I will present our complaint and compensation claim against Libya, filed with the UN Human Rights Committee, the highest international tribunal for individual petitions.

The slogan for this Conference is "Dignity and justice for all." Does this include your own country's victims of discrimination?

Thank you, Madame Chair.

 _________________

Bulgarian Nurses Sue Libya in International Tribunal; UN Watch as Co-Counsel

Related to the above testimony, click here for the new 100-page legal complaint filed by the Bulgarian nurses against Libya with the UN Human Rights Committee, the highest international tribunal for individual human rights complaints. See excerpt below, from pages 98-100, focusing on Libya's role as chair of the Durban II preparatory committee. UN Watch executive director Hillel Neuer, an international lawyer formerly with the firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, is serving as co-counsel in the action together with Dr. Liesbeth Zegveld, an international law professor and attorney in the Netherlands. The complaint is released here for the first time to the public. (Click here for the related complaint filed by Dr. El-Hojouj last year.)

Both Dr. Dr. El-Hojouj and Bulagrian nurse Kristiyna Valcheva will speak tomorrow at the Geneva Summit for Human Rights, Tolerance and Democracy, on Sunday, 19 April 2009. Watch live webcast at www.genevasummit.org This time Dr. El-Hojouj will be able to deliver his full speech — without interruptions.

  ____________________

Following is the excerpt from the Bulgarian Nurses vs. Libya lawsuit dealing with the Durban II conference.

Libya as Chair of World Conference Against Racism

Significantly, Libya today holds itself out as a world leader in combating racism and discrimination. In August 2007, Libya undertook to lead the worldwide struggle against racism when it was elected by the United Nations Human Rights Council to chair the Preparatory Committee for the Durban Review Conference. Also known as "Durban II," the conference is mandated to review progress made on implementation of measures adopted in the final declaration of the 2001 World Conference against Racism held in Durban, South Africa ("the Durban Declaration"), including assessment of contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.

Upon being named Chairperson on August 27, 2007, Libyan ambassador Najjat al-Hajjaji thanked "all member states of the UN for the confidence you have placed in my country," Libya, to chair the racism review conference.[1] In the context of the battle against discrimination, the Libyan representative specifically called attention to "[p]ersecution of migrants, asylum seekers, refugees, those of particular ethnic groups."[2] She expressed pride that the Durban process allowed "victims of racism to speak loud" about their suffering; for enabling "those who have been excluded and ostracized to break the bonds of silence"; and that "we have been able to diagnose face of racism today. To agree to practical steps."[3]

However, she omitted to mention Libya's own actions since the adoption of the 2001 Durban Declaration, which, as documented extensively by the CERD and human rights NGO's,[4] includes precisely the persecution of migrants, asylum seekers, refugees, and those of particular ethnic groups, including Libya's crimes committed against the Bulgarian nurses and the Palestinian doctor on the basis of racist and xenophobic discrimination.[5]

Speaking in October 2008, at the Third Session of the Preparatory Committee, the Libyan representative said that "the fact that we are here today shows the commitment of our countries to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance." She called for "dignity and justice for all" and said:

Let us remember the countless victims of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance throughout the world who are counting on us to make the right decisions to alleviate the problems that they are facing and which they risk facing for a long time to come as a result of our inaction. Their struggle is our struggle, their challenges are our own.[6]

Once again, Libya deliberately omitted to mention – as documented extensively by the CERD and human rights NGO's – its own "racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance," including against the Bulgarian nurses.[7] Nor did it mention Libya's own failure to "make the right decisions" to alleviate the problems faced by the authors while suffering in Libyan prisons.

It is noteworthy that, according to the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights, an important concern of the Durban Review Conference is racism against migrant workers.[8] However, in the extensive Durban Review sessions, debates, and other proceedings that have taken place since August 2007, Libya's oral and written submissions have deliberately omitted any mention of its documented practices of discrimination against migrant workers, or any mention of its specific violations against the authors.

On the contrary, in response to the Durban Review questionnaire circulated by the UN as part of the Durban Review process, where countries were asked about their implementation of the 2001 Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, Libya insisted on its unequivocal respect for non-discrimination principles, and cited in particular the treatment of foreign workers:

The sixth principle of the Green Charter defines Libya's society of non discrimination. The law of 1991 number 20 in its first article introduced the non discrimination framework between male and female. The penal code does not discriminate between local or foreign workers in Libya.[9]

Asked to identify concrete measures for racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, Libya declared:

The legislations [sic] incriminate all forms of discrimination and exploitation and racial discrimination. They are not only contained in the provisions of criminal or civil laws but also special codes like the 1991 (20) law and the green Charter. Libya provides equal work opportunity with full respect to gender equality.[10]

The remainder of Libya's submission included declarations such as "Libya does not have the practice of racial discrimination, it is combating it through the struggle against imperialism, fascism and racism at the global level. Many countries have not yet abided by their international treaty obligations";[11] Libya "is a harmonic country which provides equality to all people on its ground";[12] "Libya's legislations [sic] prohibited and criminalized all forms of discrimination even before Durban Declaration for combating racism as it was described before through adopting national legislation that prohibit discrimination mainly in law 5 and 20 of 1991."[13]

Nowhere in Libya's response to the pertinent questions of the Durban Review questionnaire did Libya acknowledge its documented practices of racism and discrimination against foreign workers in general – as detailed above by the CERD and human rights organizations[14] – or its years of violations of human rights, inter alia on grounds of discrimination, perpetrated against the Bulgarian nurses in particular.

Conclusion as regards the violation of the prohibition against discrimination

Libya violated its duties under Articles 2(1), 26 and 14 ICCPR, to respect the rights of the authors, recognized in the ICCPR without distinction of any kind, to guarantee equal treatment before the law, and the equal protection of the law and its specific duty to provide the authors with equal protection before courts and the entitlement, in full equality, to the minimum guarantees. There is substantial evidence of widespread discrimination by Libya against authors, all of which supports the conclusion that Libya's actions were in intent and effect acts of prohibited discrimination.



[1] "Libya elected to chair World Conference on Racism" (28 August 2007), at UN Watch blog, available at http://blog.unwatch.org/?p=264.

[2] "Libya elected to chair World Conference on Racism" (28 August 2007), at UN Watch blog, available at http://blog.unwatch.org/?p=264.

[3] "Libya elected to chair World Conference on Racism" (28 August 2007), at UN Watch blog, available at http://blog.unwatch.org/?p=264.

[4] See, supra, section entitled "Evidence of Libya's racist discrimination against foreign workers".

[5] "Libya elected to chair World Conference on Racism" (28 August 2007), at UN Watch blog, available at http://blog.unwatch.org/?p=264.

[6] Statement by the Chairperson, Second Substantive Session of Durban Review Conference Preparatory Committee (6 October 2008), video available at http://www.un.org/webcast/unhrc/archive.asp?go=032.

[7] See, supra, section entitled "Evidence of Libya's racist discrimination against foreign workers".

[8] "Racism against migrants: a key question at the Durban Review Conference", at OHCHR website for the Durban Review Conference, available at http://www.un.org/durbanreview2009/story12.shtml.

[9] Libyan submission in Replies to the Questionnaire by States of the African region, A/CONF.211/PC/RPM/2/2, 18 July 2008, para. 16.

[10] Libyan submission in Replies to the Questionnaire by States of the African region, A/CONF.211/PC/RPM/2/2, 18 July 2008, para. 18.

[11] Libyan submission in Replies to the Questionnaire by States of the African region, A/CONF.211/PC/RPM/2/2 (18 July 2008), para. 19.

[12] Libyan submission in Replies to the Questionnaire by States of the African region, A/CONF.211/PC/RPM/2/2 (18 July 2008), para. 20.

[13] Libyan submission in Replies to the Questionnaire by States of the African region, A/CONF.211/PC/RPM/2/2 (18 July 2008), para. 21. 

[14] See, supra, section entitled "Evidence of Libya's racist discrimination against foreign workers".